Kingdom of Nepal will soon become a state; the current king will be the last to reign in a peaceful end to the monarchy (in 2008).
To me, it looks bad ! unless there is a very strong constitution and well educated people to form a nation, monarchy is better. At least kings care about their sons (future kings) and will not make it a mess. I don't want to generalize, but consider the world we know; Arab states (Muslims states and many others are no exception) ..., compare the states or republics (with elected presidents .... ha) and the monarchies and see for yourself; economy, stability, education, quality of life and ... you name it
Saturday, December 29, 2007
NEPAL ! why is that ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I don't think It's a good idea to compare with Arab countries, since the stability in Arab countries is maintaned exclusively by how good country's relation to the United States is. Democracy is always a better solution.
Post a Comment